rename `field!` to be obvious it's from Rust `struct`

[skaunov]

it's about tasm_lib::structure::tasm_object::field

the confusion is that the crate works a lot with the field elements
and the term from Rust isn't a first association
can it be like take_Rustfield
I'm awful in naming entities -- just to illustrate the direction I'm thinking about

[jan-ferdinand]

Thanks for drawing attention to it. That’s indeed a point of confusion that has escaped me so far.

Throwing a few things out there:

• struct_field
• rust_field
• access_field

[skaunov]

Without mentioning Rust it's still easy to think about something of a finite field.

[jan-ferdinand]

I agree with that sentiment. I’d argue that a word like struct also puts the mind into programming language context, and out of finite-field context.

[skaunov]

yep it surely better, though my mind first think about that programming struct and still a field element
I guess bfe! and BFieldElement are doing a lot for this