Skip to content

Separate type for adressing properties #6

@sebastian-garn

Description

@sebastian-garn
@dereulenspiegel dereulenspiegel on 15 Feb 
I have the feeling that the combination of thingID, componentID and propertyID might a recurring construct. We should discuss if we want to encapsulate this in something like a 'ProportyPath' or something similar.

 
@sebastian-garn sebastian-garn 13 days ago Author
Could be useful. Especially if you think about how connectors later on work. They will get events from external soultions (e.g. LIFX light was turned on) and now they need to map that LIFX UUID to a "thingID-ComponentID-Property-ID "-constellation. This means they probably will have maps containing these constellations. So having a separate type for it including some convenience functions (like comparison of PropertyTypes) could be helpful. But I would suggest we do this in a separate branch. Also Matze is currently gaining some insights since he is working with the sdk. So there are probably more features that need to be added.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions