Skip to content

Conversation

@Coder-soft
Copy link
Owner

@Coder-soft Coder-soft commented Dec 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added GitHub Pages deployment automation workflow that automatically publishes static content on commits to the master branch and supports manual deployment triggers.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Added docs and multiple event types to the application including threads and bulk messages and some more
Fixing major and critical bugs, adding more support to the plug-in system, and improving a lot of ways to introduce a much more centralized way of developing plugins
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file is added to automate deployment of static content to GitHub Pages, triggered on pushes to the master branch and manual dispatch events.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Pages Deployment Workflow
\.github/workflows/static\.yml
New workflow that deploys static content to GitHub Pages on master branch commits and manual trigger, with checkout, Pages configuration, artifact upload, and deployment steps

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify GitHub Actions workflow syntax and structure are correct
  • Confirm permission scopes (contents, pages, id-token) are appropriately assigned
  • Validate the deployment job configuration and artifact handling
  • Check that the environment exposure and outputs are properly configured

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops with glee,
Pages deploy automatically!
Master branch, a magic touch,
GitHub Actions works so much,
Static sites now fly so free! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The pull request title 'mege' is vague and does not clearly convey what changes are being made. It appears to be a typo or incomplete word that provides no meaningful information about the changeset. Replace the title with a clear, descriptive summary of the main change, such as 'Add GitHub Actions workflow for static content deployment to Pages'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Coder-soft
Copy link
Owner Author

@greptile

@Coder-soft
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

added GitHub Pages workflow to deploy static documentation, but configuration deploys entire repository instead of just the docs/ directory

  • Critical Security Issue: workflow uploads entire repo (.) to public GitHub Pages, exposing sensitive files including Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, .env.example, source code (src/, plugins/, bin/), and package.json
  • should change path: '.' to path: 'docs' on line 40 to only deploy documentation

Confidence Score: 0/5

  • This PR has a critical security vulnerability that would expose the entire codebase publicly
  • Score of 0 reflects the critical security issue where the workflow deploys the entire repository to a public GitHub Pages site, exposing sensitive configuration files, source code, Docker configurations, and other internal files that should never be publicly accessible
  • .github/workflows/static.yml requires immediate attention - the path parameter must be changed from . to docs before merging

Important Files Changed

File Analysis

Filename Score Overview
.github/workflows/static.yml 1/5 added GitHub Pages deployment workflow, but deploys entire repository instead of just docs directory, exposing sensitive files

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant GH as GitHub
    participant Action as GitHub Actions
    participant Pages as GitHub Pages
    participant Public as Public Users

    Dev->>GH: Push to master branch
    GH->>Action: Trigger workflow
    Action->>Action: Checkout repository
    Action->>Action: Setup Pages configuration
    Action->>Action: Upload artifact (entire repo)
    Action->>Pages: Deploy artifact
    Pages->>Public: Serve all files publicly
    Note over Pages,Public: Exposes: src/, Dockerfile,<br/>.env.example, package.json, etc.
Loading

Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, 1 comment

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d20a36f and 5c5f5a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/static.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/static.yml (2)

31-43: Verify whether a build step is required before deployment.

The workflow does not include any build step (e.g., npm run build, python build.py, etc.). If your project requires preprocessing or compilation before serving as static content, this workflow will fail or deploy unbuilt code.

Can you confirm:

  1. Does your project require a build step before deployment?
  2. What is your build command (if applicable)?
  3. What is the output directory for built static content?

Once confirmed, I can help you add the necessary build step to the workflow.


6-7: Verify the correct trigger branch for this workflow.

The workflow currently triggers on pushes to the master branch. Given that this PR is merging masterTestingbranch, please confirm whether:

  1. This workflow should deploy when code is merged to master (production/main deployment)
  2. Or whether it should also/instead trigger on Testingbranch (for testing/staging)

If Testingbranch is your main development branch, consider adding it as an additional trigger branch.

Comment on lines 36 to 40
- name: Upload artifact
uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@v3
with:
# Upload entire repository
path: '.'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

cat -n .github/workflows/static.yml

Repository: Coder-soft/HoloBridge

Length of output: 1617


🏁 Script executed:

git ls-files | head -20

Repository: Coder-soft/HoloBridge

Length of output: 417


🏁 Script executed:

fd -t d -d 2 | head -20

Repository: Coder-soft/HoloBridge

Length of output: 147


Critical: Uploading entire repository instead of static docs directory.

The path: '.' uploads the complete repository to GitHub Pages, including application source code (src/, bin/), configuration files (Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, package.json), and git history. This exposes sensitive files and is not the intended behavior.

The repository has a docs/ directory with pre-built static content (index.html, getting-started.html, security.html, api-reference.html, styles.css) that should be deployed instead.

Change:

      - name: Upload artifact
        uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@v3
        with:
          # Upload entire repository
-         path: '.'
+         path: './docs'
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/static.yml around lines 36-40: the workflow currently uploads
the entire repository (path: '.') which exposes source code and config files;
change the artifact upload to only include the pre-built static site by setting
the upload path to the docs directory (path: 'docs/') so only files like
index.html, getting-started.html, security.html, api-reference.html, styles.css
are published to Pages; verify any prior build step outputs into docs/ (or
adjust build step to place compiled static files into docs/) and remove any
patterns that would include hidden/git files or other repo artifacts.

Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@Coder-soft Coder-soft merged commit d5908c0 into Testingbranch Dec 8, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants