-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
mege #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mege #8
Conversation
Added docs and multiple event types to the application including threads and bulk messages and some more
Fixing major and critical bugs, adding more support to the plug-in system, and improving a lot of ways to introduce a much more centralized way of developing plugins
Testingbranch
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file is added to automate deployment of static content to GitHub Pages, triggered on pushes to the master branch and manual dispatch events. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Greptile OverviewGreptile Summaryadded GitHub Pages workflow to deploy static documentation, but configuration deploys entire repository instead of just the
Confidence Score: 0/5
Important Files ChangedFile Analysis
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub
participant Action as GitHub Actions
participant Pages as GitHub Pages
participant Public as Public Users
Dev->>GH: Push to master branch
GH->>Action: Trigger workflow
Action->>Action: Checkout repository
Action->>Action: Setup Pages configuration
Action->>Action: Upload artifact (entire repo)
Action->>Pages: Deploy artifact
Pages->>Public: Serve all files publicly
Note over Pages,Public: Exposes: src/, Dockerfile,<br/>.env.example, package.json, etc.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
1 file reviewed, 1 comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/static.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/static.yml (2)
31-43: Verify whether a build step is required before deployment.The workflow does not include any build step (e.g.,
npm run build,python build.py, etc.). If your project requires preprocessing or compilation before serving as static content, this workflow will fail or deploy unbuilt code.Can you confirm:
- Does your project require a build step before deployment?
- What is your build command (if applicable)?
- What is the output directory for built static content?
Once confirmed, I can help you add the necessary build step to the workflow.
6-7: Verify the correct trigger branch for this workflow.The workflow currently triggers on pushes to the
masterbranch. Given that this PR is mergingmaster→Testingbranch, please confirm whether:
- This workflow should deploy when code is merged to
master(production/main deployment)- Or whether it should also/instead trigger on
Testingbranch(for testing/staging)If
Testingbranchis your main development branch, consider adding it as an additional trigger branch.
.github/workflows/static.yml
Outdated
| - name: Upload artifact | ||
| uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| # Upload entire repository | ||
| path: '.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n .github/workflows/static.ymlRepository: Coder-soft/HoloBridge
Length of output: 1617
🏁 Script executed:
git ls-files | head -20Repository: Coder-soft/HoloBridge
Length of output: 417
🏁 Script executed:
fd -t d -d 2 | head -20Repository: Coder-soft/HoloBridge
Length of output: 147
Critical: Uploading entire repository instead of static docs directory.
The path: '.' uploads the complete repository to GitHub Pages, including application source code (src/, bin/), configuration files (Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, package.json), and git history. This exposes sensitive files and is not the intended behavior.
The repository has a docs/ directory with pre-built static content (index.html, getting-started.html, security.html, api-reference.html, styles.css) that should be deployed instead.
Change:
- name: Upload artifact
uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@v3
with:
# Upload entire repository
- path: '.'
+ path: './docs'🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/static.yml around lines 36-40: the workflow currently uploads
the entire repository (path: '.') which exposes source code and config files;
change the artifact upload to only include the pre-built static site by setting
the upload path to the docs directory (path: 'docs/') so only files like
index.html, getting-started.html, security.html, api-reference.html, styles.css
are published to Pages; verify any prior build step outputs into docs/ (or
adjust build step to place compiled static files into docs/) and remove any
patterns that would include hidden/git files or other repo artifacts.
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.