Test: Add api test #53
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@glensc has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📥 CommitsReviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3755213204fec703e516361bc79f906dff574219 and 29921e7. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new unit test file Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/test_api.py (1)
6-14: Add docstring and more test cases.Consider adding:
- Docstring explaining the test's purpose
- Negative test cases (e.g., invalid show names)
- Edge cases (e.g., empty string, special characters)
Example docstring:
def test_api_singleton(): """ Verify that the api() function returns a singleton HttpClient instance. This ensures consistent API client usage across the application. """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43e281f and 0d9a1f1f64cef57f77e8a5e05fb7495592ff0c10.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/test_api.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/test_api.py (2)
1-5: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.The imports are logically structured and include all necessary components for the test.
12-14: Add test setup and error handling cases.The TVShow test has several potential improvements:
- Consider using test fixtures for show data
- Add error handling test cases
- Verify if the certification "TV-MA" is environment-dependent
Let's verify if the certification is environment-dependent:
glensc
force-pushed
the
test_api.py
branch
3 times, most recently
from
2c30e0a to
3755213
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/test_api.py (1)
6-10: Add docstring and descriptive assertion messages.The test logic is good and follows the single responsibility principle. Consider these enhancements:
def test_api_singleton(): + """Test that api() returns the same HttpClient instance when called multiple times.""" api1 = api() api2 = api() - assert isinstance(api1, HttpClient) - assert api1 == api2 + assert isinstance(api1, HttpClient), "api() should return an HttpClient instance" + assert api1 == api2, "Multiple calls to api() should return the same instance"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d9a1f1f64cef57f77e8a5e05fb7495592ff0c10 and 3755213204fec703e516361bc79f906dff574219.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/test_api.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/test_api.py (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and well-organized imports.All imports are properly organized and utilized in the test functions.
tests/test_api.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Test assumes undefined behavior for certification
The test asserts that show.certification equals "TV-MA", but the TVShow class implementation shows that:
- The certification attribute is initialized as None
- There's no implementation for setting or retrieving the certification value
- No evidence of dynamic fetching from API or configuration
This test is likely to fail and needs to be fixed along with the TVShow implementation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Improve test robustness and documentation.
The test could be improved in several ways:
- Add a docstring explaining the test purpose
- Consider using parameterized testing for different show scenarios
- Verify the source of the certification value
Let's verify how the certification is determined:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for certification-related code in TVShow class
ast-grep --pattern 'class TVShow {
$$$
certification $$$
$$$
}'
# Search for TV-MA constant or configuration
rg -l "TV-MA"
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and show TVShow class implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class TVShow'
# Show mock data content
cat tests/mock_data/shows.json
# Find any property definitions for certification
ast-grep --pattern '@property
def certification'
Length of output: 33265
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find TVShow class implementation
rg -A 10 "class TVShow"
# Alternative search for certification in Python files
rg -t py "certification"
Length of output: 989
Somehow left out when rebasing #51