-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
fix: blank shared blueprint visible in logic section - AB-848 #1255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughModified the type-filtering logic in BuilderSidebarToolkit to exclude only the specific type "blueprints_shared" instead of all types starting with "shared_". This targeted exclusion prevents blank Shared Blueprints from appearing in the logic section while allowing other shared-prefixed types to be included in their respective categories. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
HackerOne Code Security Review🟢 Scan Complete: 1 Issue(s) Here's how the code changes were interpreted and info about the tools used for scanning. 📖 Summary of ChangesThe modification involves adjusting the component type filtering mechanism in the BuilderSidebarToolkit Vue component. The previous broad type check using `startsWith("shared_")` has been replaced with a more specific condition that explicitly checks for `"blueprints_shared"`. This change suggests a more precise approach to filtering tools within a category.
ℹ️ Issues DetectedNOTE: These may not require action! Below are unvalidated results from the Analysis Tools that ran during the latest scan for transparency. We investigate each of these for accuracy and relevance before surfacing them as a potential problem. How will I know if something is a problem?
🧰 Analysis tools
⏱️ Latest scan covered changes up to commit f6196d8 (latest) |
|
✅ Graham C reviewed all the included code changes and associated automation findings and determined that there were no immediately actionable security flaws. Note that they will continue to be notified of any new commits or comments and follow up as needed throughout the duration of this pull request's lifecycle. Reviewed with ❤️ by PullRequest |
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.